Your best closers are stuck scheduling interviews at 10pm.
65% of recruiter time is spent on admin instead of selling and closing. AI workers can handle that coordination end-to-end.
AI workers take over the routine work of this role, while your team keeps the judgment calls. AI workers handle resume screening, interview scheduling, and candidate communication end-to-end.
Target go-live: about 30 days from kickoff. Your timeline is set in your SOW.
Your daily reality
The hidden costs of manual recruiting that hurt your billable hours.
Admin Overload
Recruiters spend 65% of their time on admin (scheduling, sourcing, data entry) instead of selling and closing — your best closers are stuck doing receptionist work
Screening Bottleneck
200+ resumes per role and nobody has time to screen them properly — good candidates slip through the cracks while you chase the same 5 people
Ghosting Problem
Candidate ghosting is out of control because response times are 3-5 days — top talent accepts other offers while you're still scheduling interviews
Coordinator Capacity
Four coordinators spend their days in Calendly and your ATS instead of moving candidates through the pipeline
Where your recruiting time actually goes
Roles we support
These are the roles whose routine work Leverwork can take over.
Recruiting Coordinators
Resume screening, interview scheduling, candidate communication
Sourcers
Candidate sourcing, outreach, database maintenance
Staffing Assistants
ATS data entry, offer coordination, onboarding support
Routine workflows, handled by AI workers with a named person for exceptions
We don't assist with recruiting admin. We handle it completely.
Job posted → 200 applications land → Recruiter manually reviews each resume → Shortlist 10-15 candidates → Schedule screening calls → Meanwhile 5 top candidates accept other offers (3-5 days delay)
Job posted → AI screens resumes against requirements → AI shortlists candidates → AI schedules interviews → AI sends personalized follow-up
Candidate shortlisted → Recruiter checks calendar availability → Email candidate 3-4 times → Back and forth to find slot → Send calendar invites → Send prep materials → Reminder emails (8 steps, 2-3 days)
AI coordinates calendar → AI proposes times → One confirmation → AI sends all materials → AI handles rescheduling
Candidate applies → Wait 3-5 days for response → If rejected, generic email → If passed to hiring manager, more waiting → Offer stage, more back-and-forth (high drop-off at every stage)
AI drafts applicant responses → AI provides status updates → AI routes offer negotiation → AI manages onboarding prep
Why not just use [industry tool]?
Good question. Here's the difference between adding tools and replacing workstreams.
ATS workflow optimization
Leverwork handles the entire screening and scheduling workflow — AI evaluates candidates against job requirements and coordinates all logistics.
Scheduling tool
Full integration with Bullhorn, Greenhouse, and LinkedIn Recruiter. End-to-end recruiting operations.
Outsourced recruiting support
AI follows the same screening, scheduling, and candidate communication rules.
We integrate with your existing stack
Leverwork connects directly to the platforms you already use — no workflow disruption, no new tools to learn.
Illustrative scenario
A 48-person staffing agency with coordinators spending 70% of their day in Calendly and Bullhorn — while candidates accepted other offers mid-scheduling — could expect Leverwork to take over resume screening, interview scheduling, and candidate communication.Illustrative scenario
Is Leverwork right for you?
Honest answer: sometimes we're not.
This works best if…
- Staffing agencies with 5+ recruiters
- Agencies using Bullhorn, Greenhouse, or Lever
- Teams spending 50%+ of time on admin and coordination
- High-volume roles (50+ applicants per opening)
Not ideal if…
Want the long-form version — implementation stages, failure modes, what to evaluate? Read how AI automation actually works in recruiting.
Put AI to work. Keep your people leading.
A 20-minute call. We'll show you which seats AI can take over — and where humans stay essential.